Search for: All records

Despite increased interest in wearables as tools for detecting various health conditions, there are not as of yet any large public benchmarks for such mobile sensing data. The few datasets that are available do not contain data from more than dozens of individuals, do not contain high-resolution raw data or do not include dataloaders for easy integration into machine learning pipelines. Here, we present Homekit2020: the first large-scale public benchmark for time series classification of wearable sensor data. Our dataset contains over 14 million hours of minute-level multimodal Fitbit data, symptom reports, and ground-truth laboratory PCR influenza test results, along with an evaluation framework that mimics realistic model deployments and efficiently characterizes statistical uncertainty in model selection in the presence of extreme class imbalance. Furthermore, we implement and evaluate nine neural and non-neural time series classification models on our benchmark across 450 total training runs in order to establish state of the art performance. 

Abstract Large scale analysis of source code, and in particular scientific source code, holds the promise of better understanding the data science process, identifying analytical best practices, and providing insights to the builders of scientific toolkits. However, large corpora have remained unanalyzed in depth, as descriptive labels are absent and require expert domain knowledge to generate. We propose a novel weakly supervised transformer-based architecture for computing joint representations of code from both abstract syntax trees and surrounding natural language comments. We then evaluate the model on a new classification task for labeling computational notebook cells as stages in the data analysis process from data import to wrangling, exploration, modeling, and evaluation. We show that our model, leveraging only easily-available weak supervision, achieves a 38% increase in accuracy over expert-supplied heuristics and outperforms a suite of baselines. Our model enables us to examine a set of 118,000 Jupyter Notebooks to uncover common data analysis patterns. Focusing on notebooks with relationships to academic articles, we conduct the largest study of scientific code to date and find that notebooks which devote an higher fraction of code to the typically labor-intensive process of wrangling data in expectation exhibit decreased citation counts for corresponding papers. We also show significant differences between academic and non-academic notebooks, including that academic notebooks devote substantially more code to wrangling and exploring data, and less on modeling.